![]() Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.Īn exhaustive and exacting analysis of Ockham’s philosophy, with particular strengths in metaphysics, cognition, natural philosophy, and theology. ![]() The controversial Alféri 1989 and even-handed Ghisalberti 1996 remain interesting and influential introductions to Ockham in Europe.Īdams, Marilyn McCord. Spade and Panaccio 2019 is a lucid, up-to-date survey, covering all of Ockham’s thought in a clear and concise fashion. ![]() All three are well suited for introducing Ockham’s philosophy to undergraduates and non-experts. This monograph is a dense but detailed discussion that is more suited for experts and advanced undergraduates, whereas Biard 1997, Maurer 1999, and Keele 2010 are clear and accessible introductions. A balanced and critical assessment of his thought and position in the history of medieval philosophy nevertheless remains an ongoing project.Īdams 1987 remains the gold standard of monographs in English on Ockham’s philosophy and much of his theology. Ockham’s reputation as an enfant terrible of the late Middle Ages, whose doctrines were commonly represented as either calamitous or revolutionary, depending on the interpreter, has been substantially revised in the past three decades. He emphasizes divine omnipotence, simplicity, and freedom, and places human freedom and rationality at the heart of his ethics and politics. He insists on a firm foundation for knowledge in our direct experience of individual and contingent objects. He exhibits a general preference for parsimony and privileges minimalism in metaphysics while developing a highly sophisticated analysis of language and logic. Despite the risk of oversimplification, we can identify certain pervasive tendencies in his thought. Ockham’s body of work is remarkable, and not only because of the abrupt shift in his intellectual and political pursuits. ![]() Ockham was excommunicated in 1328 but never officially charged with heresy. He composed a second body of work on property and property rights, heresy, and the nature, origin, and relationship of temporal and spiritual power. Eventually convinced that John XXII was a heretic, Ockham fled Avignon in 1328 in the company of Michael of Cesena and other Franciscan leaders, finding protection at the court of Ludwig of Bavaria, the Holy Roman Emperor. Ockham waded into the debate, inaugurating an interest in politics and political philosophy that would occupy him exclusively until his death. John XXII argued that use entailed ownership the Franciscans argued that it did not. There, he was drawn into the current political crisis of the day between Pope John XXII and the Franciscan order on the question of who owned the property that the Franciscan order used (buildings, clothing, food, etc.). While waiting to incept as a magister with the right to teach in the faculty of theology at Oxford, he was summoned to the papal court at Avignon in 1324, where some of his doctrines were suspected of being heretical. He entered the Franciscan order as a young boy and then studied in Oxford and London, where he composed an extensive body of work on logic, natural philosophy, and theology in accordance with the academic requirements of the time. He was an innovative and controversial thinker who lived an extraordinarily eventful life. William of Ockham (b. c. 1287–d. 1347) is one of the giants of medieval philosophy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |